1. Backup solutions — Microsoft does not provide a full backup
Under the shared responsibility model, Microsoft bears responsibility for the infrastructure — not for your data. Anyone who wants to restore mail, OneDrive content, SharePoint libraries, or Teams chats after an accidental deletion, a ransomware incident, or a malicious insider attack will not get far with the Microsoft standard features: the recycle bin typically covers 93 days of retention (OneDrive/SharePoint), mail is protected in the Recoverable Items folder for 14 days by default (configurable to up to 30 days, considerably longer in E5 with Litigation Hold). For a full data backup with longer retention, point-in-time recovery, and cross-tenant restore options, a dedicated M365 backup solution is necessary.
Typical additional cost: €3–5 per user per month for a third-party backup solution (Veeam Backup for M365, Hornetsecurity 365 Total Backup, Acronis, Barracuda, Druva). Microsoft itself launched the Microsoft 365 Backup solution in 2024 — it sits in the same price corridor and is deeply integrated. With 100 users, that means roughly €300–500 per month or €3,600–6,000 per year in addition to the M365 license.
2. Archiving — GDPR-compliant long-term retention
For GoBD- and GDPR-compliant email and document archiving beyond 6 or 10 years, the standard mailbox features are not sufficient. In Microsoft 365 E5, Purview Premium and audit-proof retention policies are already included — an important argument for E5 when compliance obligations apply. In Business Standard, Business Premium, or E3, the advanced archiving features are missing. Anyone who has to archive in an audit-proof manner there either licenses the Exchange Online Archiving add-on SKU (€2.73 per user/month) or an external archiving solution.
Typical additional cost: €3–7 per user per month, depending on retention period and compliance requirements. For 100 users that means roughly €300–700 per month — unless E5 is licensed anyway. Anyone who switches from E3 to E5 (€21.37 extra) closes this gap implicitly — with small workforces it is worth comparing the arithmetic of both paths.
3. Training and adoption cost — the underestimated TCO driver
A Microsoft 365 license that nobody knows how to use is an investment in shelfware. Adoption has to be shaped actively: initial training for end users, in-depth training for key users per application, onboarding for newcomers, refresher sessions after feature updates. Copilot for Microsoft 365 in particular requires active training — without structured use case training you end up after 6 months with an activation rate of 20–30% instead of the achievable 60–80%.
Typical benchmark: 3–5% of license cost per year for ongoing adoption — with E3 at €39.67/user/month that is roughly €14–€24 per user per year. For 100 users that means roughly €1,400–€2,400 per year for adoption activities. For Copilot roll-outs, typically 8–12% because of the greater depth of use case discussion. arades offers training programs with an initial workshop and a 4–6 week consolidation phase that demonstrably raise this rate.
4. Admin effort — the hidden staffing item
Microsoft 365 is not “self-driving”. Tenant configuration, Conditional Access policies, compliance policies, license assignments, onboarding workflows, off-boarding, audit preparation, patch reviews — all of this requires qualified IT staff. Anyone relying on in-house admins should include the staffing item in the TCO calculation.
Typical benchmark: approx. 1 FTE M365 admin per 200–500 users, depending on complexity (multiple sites, branch offices, regulated data, many application workloads). At a gross annual salary of €70,000–85,000, a staffing effort of €140–200 per user per year arises for pure Microsoft 365 management. Anyone sourcing externally (arades Application Care, managed service contract) typically pays a predictable monthly flat rate — usually cheaper than the fixed FTE, because the capacity buffer is spread across several customers.
5. Migration cost — the one-off block
Anyone migrating from an on-premises world, a third-party provider (Google Workspace, Lotus Notes), or an old Office 365 tenant structure into a modern Microsoft 365 landscape faces a one-off effort: mailboxes, OneDrive data, SharePoint content, Teams structures, Conditional Access modeling, MFA roll-out, endpoint hardening. The migration cannot be trivialized.
Typical benchmark: The initial migration costs 30–50% of the first year's license cost. With a Microsoft 365 budget of €50,000 per year, that means a one-off migration effort of €15,000–25,000. For very large or complex setups (tenant consolidation after M&A, hybrid Exchange migration, data-classified tenants), correspondingly more.
Three TCO calculation examples for typical SMB sizes
To make the abstract percentages tangible: three example scenarios as of May 2026, calculated on the Annual list price without CSP discount. The actual arades price is 10–15% below the list price and also slightly reduces the derived adoption and backup cost.
Example A · 10-user architecture firm, Business Premium
| Item |
Per month |
Per year |
| 10 × Business Premium (€20.01) | €200.10 | €2,401.20 |
| Backup (10 × €4) | €40.00 | €480.00 |
| Archiving (Exchange Online Archiving) | €27.30 | €327.60 |
| Adoption (4% of license cost) | €8.00 | €96.05 |
| Admin effort (managed service share, approx. 0.05 FTE equivalent) | €220.00 | €2,640.00 |
| Total ongoing TCO | €495.40 | €5,944.80 |
| Initial migration (40% of annual license cost) | — | one-off €960.48 |
With 10 users, the actual license cost accounts for only around 40% of the ongoing TCO — the staffing component (internal or as a managed service) is the largest block.
Example B · 80-user mid-sized company, E3 + 10 × E5 + 20 × F3
| Item |
Per month |
Per year |
| 50 × M365 E3 (€39.67) | €1,983.50 | €23,802.00 |
| 10 × M365 E5 (€61.04) | €610.40 | €7,324.80 |
| 20 × M365 F3 (€9.09) | €181.80 | €2,181.60 |
| 15 × Copilot add-on for knowledge workers (€27.30) | €409.50 | €4,914.00 |
| Backup (80 × €4) | €320.00 | €3,840.00 |
| Archiving (50 E3 users × €2.73, E5 included) | €136.50 | €1,638.00 |
| Adoption (5% of license cost) | €159.26 | €1,911.12 |
| Admin (0.2 FTE or Application Care) | €1,300.00 | €15,600.00 |
| Total ongoing TCO | €4,740.45 | €56,885.40 |
| Initial migration (35% of annual license cost) | — | one-off €13,377.84 |
Here the license component makes up the main share of the ongoing TCO at around 62% — and the mix effect (50 E3, only 10 E5 for security-critical roles, 20 F3 for frontline) saves roughly €30,400 per year compared with blanket E5 licensing.
Example C · 300-user company, E3 + 30 × E5 + 70 × F3
| Item |
Per month |
Per year |
| 200 × M365 E3 (€39.67) | €7,934.00 | €95,208.00 |
| 30 × M365 E5 (€61.04) | €1,831.20 | €21,974.40 |
| 70 × M365 F3 (€9.09) | €636.30 | €7,635.60 |
| 50 × Copilot add-on (€27.30) | €1,365.00 | €16,380.00 |
| Backup (300 × €3.50 — volume terms) | €1,050.00 | €12,600.00 |
| Archiving (200 E3 users × €2.73, E5 included) | €546.00 | €6,552.00 |
| Adoption (5% of license cost) | €588.33 | €7,059.90 |
| Admin (1 FTE in-house or Application Care) | €6,500.00 | €78,000.00 |
| Total ongoing TCO | €19,104.65 | €229,255.80 |
| Initial migration (30% of annual license cost) | — | one-off €42,359.40 |
At 300 users, the license component sits at around 58% of the ongoing TCO. At this size, the mix of 200 E3 + 30 E5 + 70 F3 (Copilot not included in the comparison) is roughly €18,000 per year cheaper than a blanket 300 × E3 and roughly €94,900 per year cheaper than a blanket 300 × E5 — anyone licensing across the board burns six-figure amounts per year structurally.
What the License Cost Calculator does differently.
The arades License Cost Calculator shows not only list and CSP prices but also models the TCO components on request. That makes the decision paper robust for the CFO and management — no nasty surprises 6 months after go-live. More about the License Cost Calculator →